Список литературы.
Проблема переноса предметных знаний и умений во внеакадемический контекст
Тюменева Ю. А, Вальдман А. И. (2014). Что дают предметные знания для умения применять их в новом контексте? Первые результаты сравнительного анализа TIMSS-2011 и PISA-2012, проведенных на одной и той же выборке российских учащихся. Вопросы образования, 1. Центр оценки качества образования ИСМО РАО. Основные результаты международного исследования качества математического и естественнонаучного… Читать ещё >
Список литературы. Проблема переноса предметных знаний и умений во внеакадемический контекст (реферат, курсовая, диплом, контрольная)
1. Ковалева Г. С., Результаты международного исследования TIMSS-2011 // Вопросы образования, 2012.
2. Тюменева Ю. А, Вальдман А. И. (2014). Что дают предметные знания для умения применять их в новом контексте? Первые результаты сравнительного анализа TIMSS-2011 и PISA-2012, проведенных на одной и той же выборке российских учащихся. Вопросы образования, 1.
3. Центр оценки качества образования ИСМО РАО. Основные результаты международного исследования образовательных достижений учащихся ПИЗА-2003, 2004.
4. Центр оценки качества образования ИСМО РАО. Основные результаты международного исследования качества математического и естественнонаучного образования TIMSS-2011, 2012.
5. Barnett, S., & Ceci, S. J. (2002).When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612−637.
6. Barton, B. (1996). Anthropological Perspectives on Mathematics and Mathematics Education. In Bishop, A.J. et al.(eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/ Boston/ London. p.1035−1053.
7. Blum, W., & Ferri, R.B. (2009). Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45−58.
8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Broad, M. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (1992). Transfer of Training: Action-packed Strategies to Ensure High Payoff from Training Investments., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
10. Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J., & Long, C. (1989). Analogical Transfer in Young Children: Analogies as Tools for Communication and Exposition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 275−293.
11. Broomes, D. (1989). The Mathematical Demands of a Rural Economy, in C. Keitel, P. Damerow, A. Bishop, and P. Gerdes (eds.). Mathematics Education and Society, United Nations Educational Scientific: Paris.
12. Buckingham, J. (2012). Keeping PISA in Perspective: Why Australian Education Policy Should Not Be Driven by International Test Results. IssueAnalysis, 136.
13. Calais, J. (2006). Haskell’s Taxonomies Of Transfer Of Learning: Implications For Classroom Instruction. National forum of applied educational research journal, 20 (3).
14. Crowther (1959) 15 to 18: Report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England). HMSO.
15. Desse, J. (1958). Transfer of Training: The Psychology of Learning, McGraw-Hill, New York.
16. Dixon, R. A. (2012). Transfer of learning: Connecting concepts during problem solving. Journal of Technology education, 24.
17. Dossey, J. A., McCrone, S., & O’Sullivan, C. (2006). Problem solving in the PISA and TIMSS 2003 assessments technical report. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Dept. of Education.
18. Engle, R.A. (2006). Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom. The journal of the learning science, 15(4), 451−498.
19. Fogarty, R., Perkins, D., & Barrell, J. (1992). The Mindful School: How to Teach for Transfer. Highett, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.
20. Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 253−292.
21. Frejd, P. (2013). Modes of modelling assessment — A literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(3), 413−438.
22. Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
23. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393- 408.
24. Gerdes, P. (1996). Ethnomathematics and Mathematics Education. In BISHOP, A.J. et al.(eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/ Boston/ London, 909−943.
25. Grшnmo, L. S., Kjжrnsli, M., & Lie, S. (2004). Looking for cultural and geographical factors in patterns of response to TIMSS items. In C. Papanastasiou (Ed.), Proceedings of the IRC-2004 TIMSS (Vol. 1, pp. 99−112). Nicosia: Cyprus University Press.
26. Grшnmo, L. S., & Olsen, R. V. (2006). TIMSS versus PISA: The case of pure and applied mathematics — 2nd IEA International Research Conference.
27. Haskell, E.H. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. New York: Academic Press.
28. Hutchison, D., & Schagen, I. (2007). Comparisons between PISA and TIMSS — Are we the man with two watches? In Loveless, T. (Eds.), Lessons Learned — What international assessments tell us about math achievement. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press, 227−261.
29. Jensen (2012) Catching Up: Learning from the Best School Systems in East Asia (Melbourne: Grattan Institute report, 3.
30. Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. ETR&D, 45(1), 65−94.
31. Jonassen, D.H., & Tessmer, M. (1996). An outcomes-based taxonomy for the design, evaluation, and research of instructional systems. Training Research Journal.
32. Kintsch, W. (1970). Learning, memory, and conceptual processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Leberman, McDonald, & Doyle (2006). The Transfer of Learning: Participants' Perspectives of Adult Education and Training. Gower Publishing.
34. Lehman, D. R., Lempert, R. O., & Nisbett, R. E. (1988). The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. American Psychologist, 43(6), 431−442.
35. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ.
36. Masters (2005). International Achievement Studies: Lessons from PISA and TIMSS. Research Developments 13.
37. Mayer, R.E. (1987). The elusive search for teachable aspects of problem solving. In J.A. Glover & R.R. Ronning (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psychology (pp. 327−347). New York: Plenum Press.
38. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
39. OECD (2002). Definition and selection of competences (DESECO). Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations, Strategy paper.
40. OECD (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies, Executive summary.
41. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy, OECD Publishing.
42. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1996). Learning transfer. In A. C. Tuijnman (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training (2nd edn., pp. 422−27). Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon Press.
43. Pollak, H. O. (1979). The Interaction between Mathematics and Other School Subjects. In: UNESCO (Ed.), New Trends in Mathematics Teaching IV. Paris, 232−248.
44. Ripple, R. E., & Drinkwater, D. J. (1982). In Encyclopedia of Educational Research Free Press, New York, 19−48.
45. Royer J.M. (1978). Theories of learning transfer. Technical Report № 79.
46. Schoenfeld, A. H.: 1987, 'Confessions of an Accidental Theorist', For the Learning of Mathematics 7(1), 30−39.
47. Sierpinska, A., & Lerman, S. (1996). Epistomologies of Mathematics and of Mathematics Education. In A. J. BISHOP, A.J. ET AL.(eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/ Boston/ London. p.827−876.
48. Sutton, M. J. (2003). Problem representation, understanding, and learning transfer: Implications for technology education research. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 40(4), 47−61.
49. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). Theinfluence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 384−395.
50. Turner, R. (2007). Modelling and applications in PISA. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study, (pp. 433−440). New York: Springer.
51. VanderStoep, S.W. & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1997). Taking a course in research methods Improves reasoning about real-life events. Teaching of psychology, 4, 122−124.
52. Willimson, Z., & Schell, J. (2010). Transfer of Learning. OnRamps Texac college readiness, Instructional Design Memo.
53. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.